Prototype. Every figure on this page is illustrative. The register holds 8 sample assets from the MoPED data-model workbook and 112 generated to match its schema — no real asset, valuation or coordinate.

Data Governance

The register checked against its own contract

The Data Dictionary describes itself as the contract between the ministry and the platform: every field carries a status, a source and, for dropdown columns, the vocabulary it must draw from. This page executes that contract against all 120 rows rather than restating it, so a field added to the sheet is validated without a code change.

Mean completeness

⁦94%⁩

against the fields each asset is expected to carry

Clean records

⁦84⁩

of 120, no errors or warnings

Errors

⁦16⁩

contract violations

Warnings

⁦21⁩

conditional gaps and inconsistencies

Notes

⁦35⁩

provenance notes, not defects

Capital behind blockers

⁦EGP 14.4bn⁩

across 19 distinct blockers

Findings

Grouped by rule, most severe first.

  • Mandatory field left blank

    The Dictionary marks the field Mandatory and the cell is empty. Structural exemptions already apply — a vacant plot is not asked for a built-up area.

    ⁦13⁩

    13 assets

  • Value outside its controlled vocabulary

    Someone free-typed into a dropdown column, which the workbook README explicitly forbids. The value is shown verbatim rather than translated.

    ⁦2⁩

    2 assets

  • Year built in the future

    A construction year later than the register's as-of date, usually a transposed digit.

    ⁦1⁩

    1 assets

  • Title or ownership disputed

    No monetization route can complete while the title is contested. Flagged so these never enter a disposal pipeline by accident.

    ⁦14⁩

    14 assets

  • Conditional field unanswered

    The field is mandatory for assets of this shape — rooms for an internally divided building, a scope where renovation is required — and no value was given.

    ⁦5⁩

    5 assets

  • Leasable area exceeds built-up area

    Gross leasable area cannot be larger than the building that contains it.

    ⁦2⁩

    2 assets

  • Low or unverified confidence

    The analyst rated this record's data confidence low. The figures are usable for screening, not for a decision.

    ⁦31⁩

    31 assets

  • No site visit recorded

    Compiled from desk sources alone. Physical condition and occupancy on these rows are inferred rather than observed.

    ⁦4⁩

    4 assets

Where the gaps are

Fields attracting the most findings across the register.

Record status

  • Validated⁦46⁩
  • Under review⁦27⁩
  • Draft⁦22⁩
  • Published⁦22⁩
  • Archived⁦3⁩

Data confidence

  • Medium⁦46⁩⁦EGP 3.7bn⁩
  • High⁦43⁩⁦EGP 3.8bn⁩
  • Low⁦21⁩⁦EGP 1.7bn⁩
  • Unverified⁦10⁩⁦EGP 537.7m⁩

Blocker register

Market value held up behind each recorded blocker.

  • Licence lapsed, violation on record must be settled⁦EGP 2.9bn⁩34 assets
  • Title unregistered, registration file must be opened⁦EGP 2.4bn⁩34 assets
  • Clearing informal occupants from the site⁦EGP 2.2bn⁩29 assets
  • No independent road access, easement to be negotiated⁦EGP 1.6bn⁩14 assets
  • Existing government unit must be relocated first⁦EGP 1.1bn⁩16 assets
  • Active litigation with former operator⁦EGP 927.2m⁩14 assets
  • Utility connections lapsed, reconnection fees outstanding⁦EGP 596m⁩7 assets
  • Waqf consent required before any disposal⁦EGP 587.5m⁩11 assets
  • Staff tenancy terms need review before market letting⁦EGP 493.6m⁩10 assets
  • Boundary survey disputed by the neighbouring parcel⁦EGP 425.3m⁩7 assets
  • Heritage listing limits permitted interventions⁦EGP 377.4m⁩8 assets
  • licence lapsed⁦EGP 139.1m⁩1 assets
  • Heritage listing limits façade changes⁦EGP 123m⁩1 assets
  • archive relocation needed⁦EGP 123m⁩1 assets
  • Clearing informal occupants⁦EGP 94m⁩1 assets
  • recorded violation must be settled⁦EGP 94m⁩1 assets
  • Title unregistered⁦EGP 66.6m⁩1 assets
  • caretaker resettlement⁦EGP 66.6m⁩1 assets
  • Waqf consent, heritage approvals, specialist restoration contractors⁦EGP 11.7m⁩1 assets

Records needing attention

Lowest completeness first, scored against the fields the asset's own class is expected to carry.

AssetCompletenessMissing mandatoryLast updated
ISM-LND-0090Unused State Land — Ismailia El Sheikh Zayed Quarter⁦85%⁩None⁦17 Jul 2026⁩
MNF-AGR-0014Reclaimed Farmland Parcel — Shebin El Kom⁦85%⁩None⁦20 Aug 2026⁩
DKH-LND-0096Undeveloped Parcel — Industrial Area⁦85%⁩None⁦30 Dec 2025⁩
PTS-LND-0081Unused State Land — Port Said El Arab⁦86%⁩Full Address (AR)⁦29 Oct 2025⁩
SHR-LND-0012Unused State Land — Zagazig City Centre⁦86%⁩None⁦21 Sept 2026⁩
AST-LND-0048Unused State Land — Assiut El Walidiya⁦86%⁩None⁦29 Sept 2026⁩
SSI-AGR-0029Reclaimed Farmland Parcel — Sharm El Sheikh⁦86%⁩None⁦11 Feb 2026⁩
BNS-LND-0118Vacant Plot — East Nile⁦88%⁩Current Use⁦5 Sept 2026⁩
ASW-LND-0037Unused State Land — Aswan Corniche⁦88%⁩None⁦13 Jul 2026⁩
SUZ-LND-0010Vacant Plot — Port Zone⁦88%⁩Current Use⁦10 Dec 2025⁩
DKH-LND-0102Undeveloped Parcel — Industrial Area⁦88%⁩None⁦18 Jun 2026⁩
GIZ-LND-0086Reserved Plot No. 16 — Agouza⁦88%⁩None⁦1 Aug 2026⁩